Health technology assessment bodies have also updated their guidance on conducting and appraising economic evaluations.
Economix michael goodwin pdf download update#
This includes an update of methods proposed by the Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (“Second Panel”), which contained new recommendations concerning the perspective of economic evaluations, the classification of costs and benefits in a structured table, and the inclusion of related and unrelated healthcare costs in added years of life. There have also been methods developments in economic evaluation motivating an update. It has also been used as a tool to quantitatively score studies in systematic reviews, an approach that could mislead readers and reviewers as it has not been designed for this purpose.
CHEERS has also been observed to be used inappropriately, as a tool to assess quality of methods, for which other tools exist, rather than the quality of reporting.
These include feedback on perceived limitations of CHEERS, including criticism of its neglect of addressing reporting of cost-benefit analyses. Since the original publication of the CHEERS statement, there have been several developments that have motivated an update. The CHEERS statement consolidated previous health economic evaluation reporting guidelines into one current, useful reporting guidance. Some checklist items (such as title, abstract) were also included to aid those researching economic evaluation literature. In doing so, it can also aid interested researchers in replicating research findings. CHEERS was intended to help authors provide accurate information on which health interventions are being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings are, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The statement consisted of a 24-item checklist and Explanation and Elaboration Report. The goal of the original Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, was to recommend the minimum amount of information required for reporting of published health economic evaluations. There remains a need for reporting guidance to help authors, journal editors, and peer reviewers in their identification and interpretation. Despite a growth in published economic evaluations and availability of reporting guidance, there is a considerable lack of standardisation and transparency in reporting. Economic evaluations are a particular challenge for reporting because substantial information must be conveyed to allow scrutiny of study findings. They can provide useful information to policy makers, payers, health professionals, patients, and the public about choices that affect health and the use of resources. It may also be useful for health technology assessment bodies seeking guidance on reporting, as there is an increasing emphasis on transparency in decision making.Įconomic evaluations of health interventions are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. However, we anticipate familiarity with reporting requirements will be useful for analysts when planning studies. The CHEERS 2022 statement is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer reviewed journals as well as the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication.
This summary article presents the new CHEERS 2022 28-item checklist and recommendations for each item. It is also broadly applicable to any form of intervention intended to improve the health of individuals or the population, whether simple or complex, and without regard to context (such as health care, public health, education, social care, etc). It reflects the need for guidance that can be more easily applied to all types of health economic evaluation, new methods and developments in the field, as well as the increased role of stakeholder involvement including patients and the public. The new CHEERS 2022 statement replaces previous CHEERS reporting guidance. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately which health interventions were being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings were, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences.
0 kommentar(er)
